This article states that the second amendment is no longer necessary due to our advancing technologies as it might of during the post-colonial age. The author states that he/she believes that they will not clarify or repeal the second amendment but theirs still will be arguments over it.
The article explains both sides of the debate wether or not we should have guns. it explains if we should have them for self defense, what types of guns we can't use, and wether or not weapons should only be reduced to the military.
The article explains why american citizens need guns and explains how it has helped us in the passed. This article also states the boundaries of what types of weapons we can use and what kind of guns should be reduced to the military.
The article states that because of shootings and other terroristic acts have caused some states and congressmen to question the 2nd amendment. Some states use to pass laws prohibiting guns usages in certain areas. Also, the article states that if we put a ban on guns how will we defend our selves.
Do you think that second amendment is useful. choose your side on this website