I placed this as #3 because although it does not have any ads, and it shows the year of creation, there is no credibility in photos.
I placed this as #1 because it follows all the rules of a reliable site, there are hardly any ads, photos have been credited, and the name of the writer as well as a description about them is there.
I placed this as #7 because the site is very empty, there are irrelevant ads, no author, and no year of publish.
I placed this as #4 because there are a few ads, no author and no year of publish.
I placed this as #8 because although there is an author and year of publish, there are lots of ads and the whole article is about someones opinion on how much sleep teens should be getting.
I placed this as #5 because there are a few more ads and no credit on photos. Sentences are also very ongoing.
I placed this as #2 because there are no ads at all, it seems reliable, but it does not show the creator or the year it was made in.
I placed this as #6 because there is no author, no year of publish, no comments, and information seems old.