This website by abc.net describes the scientific research made to see what effect climate change has on the Daintree rainforest. It explains how some species of plants and animals benefit from a warmer climate and how some others are struggle and starting to become threatened by the warmer climate. Like the other websites, it fails to label it's source however judging by abc's credibility and trustworthyness, it can be said that this information is most likely reliable.
This book describes the daintree rainforest and the different endangered species and plants within it, it also describes their habitat within the forest. Being a book, most likely it has facts that are backed up with sources and proof-read. It might be impossible to know the reliability of the facts however until it is bought and checked.
This websites describes the fact that Aboriginals were the original human populace living in the Forest before any other foreigners arrived in Australia. It also explains how they relied on the forest for ever day lives but eventually started losing numbers as European settlers started arriving in Australia. The information on this website could potentially be useful, but no sources are said so it's impossible to know the reliability of this website.
This video found on youtube gives a lot of interesting facts and information about the Daintree Rainforest and labels many threats to the Daintree Rainforest. It goes into detail on some of the threats that are currently threatening the Rainforest as well as explaining the consequences of these threats. One possible source was found in the description but no clarification was made to say if it was used to get research for the topic or not.
This article by the national geographic explains why the Daintree Restraint is in danger and needs to be saved. It describes how the forest holds many different species and types of plants as well as it's 122 endangered species and plants. Being a Australian known network, the national geographic could be said as trustworthy and reliable, but however not a single source is said so it is unknown on the reliability on the information.