In conclusion, I do not believe that Stalin was a savior of the USSR. Through the social and economic impacts that I've looked through, Stalin's rule only brought little or no positive impact to the USSR and instead made the country worse as people were living their lives with fear and no freedom and there was little improvement in their economy and even in the side of politics. Thus I can conclude that Stalin's rule was not beneficial for the USSR and that he is not the savior of USSR.
This source is a video about the social impact of Stalin's rule. Stalin's brought about the great terror as everyone lived in fear everyday afraid that they might be killed if they do something of the slightest mistake. The great terror resulted in many deaths of innocent people. This shows that Stalin's rule is not beneficial to the USSR because innocent lives were lost for no important reason.
this source is a video that explains the economic impact of Stalin's rule which includes the industrialisation and five year plans that played a major role in the economic impact during Stalin's rule. I picked this source because this video very clearly and simply explains the effects of Stalin's implementations that affected the economy of USSR. This shows that Stalin's rule was not beneficial for USSR.
This source shows the economic impact of Stalin's rule. Stalin' five year plans caused many people to work vigorously to keep up with the targets set. I chose this source because the five year plans are one of the controversial economic impact of Stalin's rule as it caused many deaths however was still considered a success. This shows that Stalin's rule was beneficial to the USSR because the five year plans prepared them for world war II.
This source shows a group of farmers gathered together to show their unhappiness towards Stalin's plans because of his five year plans. I chose this source cause it shows how the implementation of the five year plan affected the famers and peasants. Although it was seen by Stalin as a success, many people were affected. The agriculture sector was severely hampered because of collective farms and many harvests were lost and eventually caused the Great famine to happen. This shows that Stalin's rule was not beneficial to USSR because many people were affected negatively.
This source shows the negative impact of Stalin's rule that everyone lived in fear during Stalin's rule because they were being constantly watched and judged by Stalin's officials and if they had wrong reasons or upset the officials they would be sent to labour camps or even killed. I chose this course because it shows one of the negative social impacts of Stalin's rule. This source shows that Stalin's rule did not benefit the people of the USSR because he caused a fall in standard of living and people to live in fear.
This source mainly shows the social impact on women Stalin had during his rule. It shows that women are encouraged women to enter the workforce and participate more to the economy. I chose this source because this is a positive social impact that Stalin had during his rule. This resulted that Stalin's rule is beneficial because he gave equal rights to women and men.